Ensuring a good quality of life for animals in human care. This means minimizing pain, providing proper housing, nutrition, and veterinary care, and allowing natural behaviors.
This leads to abolitionist conclusions:
Despite their differences, the welfare and rights movements share a revolutionary core: Both reject Descartes’ horrifying view that animals are unconscious automata. Both are rooted in the irrefutable science of animal sentience—pain, fear, joy, and grief have been documented in fish, birds, octopuses, and mammals across the tree of life. Ensuring a good quality of life for animals in human care
Animal rights, on the other hand, take a more philosophical approach, advocating for the inherent rights of animals to live free from exploitation, harm, and suffering. This perspective posits that animals have intrinsic value and should be treated as individuals with autonomy, rather than mere commodities or property. Both are rooted in the irrefutable science of
The gold standard for welfare is the originally developed for livestock but now applied across the board: The gold standard for welfare is the originally